140. Removal, resignation of auditor and giving of special notice
(1) The auditor appointed under section 139
may be removed from his office before the expiry of his term only by a
special resolution of the company, after obtaining the
previous approval of the Central Government in that behalf in the
prescribed manner:
Provided that before taking any action under this
sub-section, the auditor concerned shall be given a reasonable opportunity
of being heard.
(2) The auditor who has resigned from the
company shall file within a period of thirty days from the date of resignation, a statement in the prescribed form
with the company and the Registrar, and in case of companies
referred to in sub-section (5) of section 139,
the auditor shall also file such statement with the Comptroller and
Auditor-General of India, indicating the reasons and
other facts as may be relevant with regard to his resignation.
(3) If the auditor does not comply with
sub-section (2), he or it shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than
fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees.
(4)
i.
Special notice shall be required for a
resolution at an annual general meeting appointing as auditor a person other
than a retiring auditor, or providing expressly that a
retiring auditor shall not be re-appointed, except where the retiring
auditor has completed a consecutive tenure of five years or, as
the case may be, ten years, as provided under sub-section (2) of section 139.
ii.
On receipt of notice of such a
resolution, the company shall forthwith send a copy
thereof to the retiring auditor.
iii.
Where notice is given of such a
resolution and the retiring auditor makes with respect thereto representation in writing to the company (not exceeding
a reasonable length) and requests its notification to
members of the company, the company shall, unless the
representation is received by it too late for it to do so,—
a)
in any notice of the resolution given
to members of the company, state the fact of the representation having been
made; and
b)
send a copy of the representation to
every member of the company to whom notice of the meeting is sent, whether
before or after the receipt of the representation by the company, and if a copy of the representation is
not sent as aforesaid because it was received too late
or because of the company’s default, the auditor may (without prejudice
to his right to be heard orally) require that the
representation shall be read out at the meeting:
Provided that if a copy of representation is not sent
as aforesaid, a copy thereof shall be filed with the Registrar:
Provided further that if the Tribunal is satisfied on an
application either of the company or of any other aggrieved person that
the rights conferred by this sub-section are being
abused by the auditor, then, the copy of the representation may not be
sent and the representation need not be read out at
the meeting.
(5) Without prejudice to any action under
the provisions of this Act or any other law for the time being in force, the Tribunal either suo motu or on an application made to it by the Central Government or by any person
concerned, if it is satisfied that the auditor
of a company has, whether directly or
indirectly, acted in a fraudulent manner or abetted or
colluded in any fraud by, or in relation to, the company or its
directors or officers, it may, by order, direct the company to change its
auditors:
Provided that if the application is made by the
Central Government and the Tribunal is satisfied that any change of the
auditor is required, it shall within fifteen days of receipt of
such application, make an order that he shall not function as an auditor
and the Central Government may appoint another auditor
in his place:
Provided further that an auditor, whether individual or firm,
against whom final order has been passed by the Tribunal under
this section shall not be eligible to be appointed as
an auditor of any company for a period of five years from the date of
passing of the order and the auditor shall also be liable for
action under section 447.
Explanation I.— It
is hereby clarified that the case of a firm, the liability shall be of the
firm and that of every partner or partners who acted in a fraudulent
manner or abetted or colluded in any fraud by, or in
relation to, the company or its director or officers.
Explanation II.— For
the purposes of this Chapter the word “auditor” includes a firm
of auditors.
Content~ MCA Official Site
Comments
Post a Comment
If you have any doubt, let me know in the comment section.